Evaluating credible and scholarly scientific sources

 

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources

 

 

 

Week Two Assignment

 

 

 

In this assignment, you will examine three different sources – one source that would be considered scholarly, one source that is credible but not scholarly, and one source that would not be considered credible for use in an academic paper. After completing a worksheet on each source, can you identify which is which?

 

 

 

Instructions

 

 

 

When looking up various scientific topics, including the example topic this week on technology and food production in the U.S., you will find all kinds of information out there. Not all of it is reliable. In order to determine if a source provides credible information, you will need to take the time to evaluate that source first before you can trust its content. Who is the intended audience of the source? Who is the author or publisher and what is their purpose for publishing the resource? These are examples of the questions you will want to ask yourself when evaluating a source.

 

 

 

Examine these three sources and fill out the following worksheet for each one. You will be determining what type of source it is (scholarly, credible non-scholarly, and non-credible), its level of credibility, and its possible value or use within the scientific conversation about technology and agriculture in the U.S.

 

 

 

To help you determine the credibility of a source, refer this quick video tutorial on Evaluating Sources for Credibility. Additionally, consult the strategies outlined in the  CRAAP TEST. Keep in mind that you are evaluating the sources themselves and not the content within the source, or whether you agree with the positions or statements that are expressed within the source. Please write your answers in complete sentences.

 

 

 

 

 

Source Links

 

 

 

Source #1:  http://www.saynotogmos.org/

 

 

 

Source #2:  http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064879

 

 

 

Source #3:  https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/usa.php

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source #1

 

 

 

1.                  What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

 

 

 

  Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

 

  Fact sheet / data / statistics

 

  News

 

  Government or organizational website

 

  Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

 

  Anecdote / personal experience

 

 Propaganda

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

2.                  Currency: For this topic, is the information…

 

 

 

 Up to date

 

 Outdated

 

 Not sure (explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

3.                  The purpose of the information is to:

 

 

 

 Inform

 

 Persuade

 

 Entertain

 

 Sell

 

 Other:       

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

4.                  Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know? (Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.                  Who published this source?  

 

 

 

 The author himself/herself                    An academic journal

 

 A magazine                                          A professional organization

 

 A government entity                            Other(explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

6.                  The point of view of this source seems to be

 

 

 

 Objective and impartial

 

 Biased

 

 

 

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

7.                  Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees? 

 

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

8.                  Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

 

academic one? Why or why not?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

9.         Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

 

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

 

           

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

10.       In my opinion this source is…

 

 

 

 Scholarly

 

 Non-scholarly and credible

 

 Non-scholarly and not credible

 

Source #2

 

 

 

1.         What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

 

 

 

  Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

 

  Fact sheet / data / statistics

 

  News

 

  Government or organizational website

 

  Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

 

  Anecdote / personal experience

 

 Propaganda

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

2.                     Currency: For this topic, is the information…

 

 

 

 Up to date

 

 Outdated

 

 Not sure (explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

3.                  The purpose of the information is to:

 

 

 

 Inform

 

 Persuade

 

 Entertain

 

 Sell

 

 Other:       

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

4.                  Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know?  Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.                  Who published this source?  

 

 

 

 The author himself/herself                    An academic journal

 

 A magazine                                          A professional organization

 

 A government entity                            Other(explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

6.                  The point of view of this source seems to be

 

 

 

 Objective and impartial

 

 Biased

 

 

 

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

7.                  Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees? 

 

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

8.                  Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

 

academic one? Why or why not?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

9.         Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

 

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

 

           

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

10.       In my opinion this source is…

 

 

 

 Scholarly

 

 Non-scholarly and credible

 

 Non-scholarly and not credible

 

Source #3

 

 

 

1.         What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

 

 

 

  Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

 

  Fact sheet / data / statistics

 

  News

 

  Government or organizational website

 

  Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

 

  Anecdote / personal experience

 

 Propaganda

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

2.         Currency: For this topic, is the information…

 

 

 

 Up to date

 

 Outdated

 

 Not sure (explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

3.         The purpose of the information is to:

 

 

 

 Inform

 

 Persuade

 

 Entertain

 

 Sell

 

 Other:       

 

 

 

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

4.                  Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know?  (Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are            formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.                  Who published this source?  

 

 

 

 The author himself/herself                    An academic journal

 

 A magazine                                          A professional organization

 

 A government entity                            Other(explain):       

 

 

 

 

 

6.                  The point of view of this source seems to be

 

 

 

 Objective and impartial

 

 Biased

 

 

 

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

7.                  Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees? 

 

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

8.                  Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

 

academic one? Why or why not?

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

9.                  Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

 

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

 

           

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

10.              In my opinion this source is…

 

 

 

 Scholarly

 

 Non-scholarly and credible

 

 Non-scholarly and not credible

 

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency