Howard Community College Unhealthy Teen Identity Development Discussion

I’m working on a sociology writing question and need support to help me learn.

A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called “References” or “Works Cited” depending on the style format you are using. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (i.e., the author, title, publisher, etc.).

An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation. Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/index.html (Links to an external site.)).

  • Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is. For more help, see our handout on paraphrasing (Links to an external site.) sources.
  • Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? For more help, see our handouts on evaluating resources (Links to an external site.).
  • Reflect: Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?

Requirements for Step 2:

  1. Identify at least five sources of information about your research topic from academic articles, newspapers, or approved websites (at least 1 from peer reviewed sources).
  2. After identifying and researching your five sources, you are required to annotate the sources (see above). The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.
  3. The annotation for each source should be 1-2 paragraphs (typed, double spaced, 12pt font), and the sources need to be presented in APA style bibliographic form and annotated.

In your Annotated Bibliography and your final Exploratory Essay assignments that you turn in on Canvas, BE SURE TO CITE YOUR REFERENCES, both IN the body of your paper and in a reference list at the end, and use APA style of citation. Your essay should include a minimum of five academic and/or official sources in addition to the course text. No more than 10% of direct quotations in the essay.

Please note: Wikipedia, “some person”(s) websites, and magazine and newspaper articles are not academic sources. You should be using journal articles, books, and websites from .edu and .gov sites, written by academics who are well recognized within their fields.

Rubric

SOCI 102: Annotated Bibliography

SOCI 102: Annotated Bibliography

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply strategies of inquiry and exploration in finding information about social problems.

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

The annotated bibliography contains at least five sources that are appropriate to advancing an understanding of the topic.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

The annotated bibliography contains at least five sources that are appropriate to advancing an understanding of the topic.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

The annotated bibliography contains at least five sources that may be appropriate to the topic but they are not from approved academic, newspaper, or .gov sources.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

The annotated bibliography lacks five sources or the sources are not appropriate to advancing an understanding of the topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate the authority, credibility, and purpose of sources used.

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Annotations thoroughly evaluate sources by discussing their relevance, accuracy, and quality.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

Annotations evaluate sources by discussing their relevance, accuracy, and quality.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Annotations inadequately evaluate sources by minimally discussing their relevance, accuracy, and quality.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Annotations poorly evaluate or fail to evaluate sources.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrate the ethical and discipline specific use of information

10 to >8.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Proper citations using APA style.

8 to >6.0 pts

Meets Objective

Proper citations using APA style although there are some errors.

6 to >4.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

There are significant errors with the citations.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Paper does not use APA style of citation.

10 pts

Total Points: 50




Organizing an Exploratory Essay

An exploratory paper is, in essence, a retrospective of your writing and thinking process as you work through a social problem. It describes when, how, and why you completed certain types of research. This kind of writing is about how you work through problems that require writing and research. You will have to be introspective and think about your thinking process in order for your essay to turn out well.

Very roughly, then, your exploratory paper may follow this sort of structure:

Introduction

The introduction should outline the problem you explored and why it’s important. In addition, you should briefly discuss 1) some of the problem’s possible causes; 2) the institutions and people involved with the problem; 3) some of the possible solutions to the problem. A brief overview of the types of sources your researched during your inquiry.

Body Paragraphs

Body paragraphs should discuss the inquiry process you followed to research your problem. These paragraphs should include the following:

  1. Introduction of sources (title, author, type of media, publisher, publication date, etc.) and why you chose to use each in your exploration;
  2. Important information you found in the sources regarding your problem;
  3. Why the information is important and dependable in relation to the problem;
  4. Some personal introspection on how the sources helped you, allowed you to think differently about the problem, or even fell short of your expectations and led you in a new direction in your research.

Conclusion

The conclusion should restate the problem you explored, outline some of its possible causes, review the institutions and people involved, and highlight some possible solutions. If you still have any questions about the problem (and it’s ok to have some), you will discuss them here. Talk about why you think you still have questions regarding the problem you explored, where you might look to answer these questions, and what other forms of research you would have to do.

Requirements for Step 3:

  1. Building on the previous parts of the assignment, write a 5 page research paper, 12 pt., typed, and double spaced.
  2. The paper should address these central questions:
  • What is the social problem?
  • Who claims it is a problem, what are their claims, and why are they claiming the issue as a social problem? Are there competing claims about the nature and extent of the social problem?
  • How well does existing empirical evidence support these claims?
  • What does the evidence tell us about who is affected by the problem? What are the causes and/or consequences of the problem?
  • What solutions are being proposed to address the problem?
  • You need to have a work cited page. The paper will be graded for both content and writing quality. Please re-read, proofread, and revise your work before turning it in.

Rubric

SOCI-102 Social Problems Exploratory Paper STEP 3: Final Paper rubrics

SOCI-102 Social Problems Exploratory Paper STEP 3: Final Paper rubrics

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear definition and explanation of the problem

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Clearly defines explains problem.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

Adequately defines and explains the problem.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Poorly defines explains the problem.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Fails to define and/or explain the problem.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenerate ideas, and/or, explore possibilities about the causes and consequences of a social problem, and considers alternative approaches to solving a social problem

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Demonstrates the ability to generate and explore a wide range of ideas about the causes and consequences of a social problem and considers a range of alternatives approaches to solving a social problem.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

Demonstrates the ability to explore a reasonably wide range of ideas about the causes and consequences of a social problem and considers some alternative approaches to solving a social problem.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Demonstrates minimal ability to explore, and consider a range of ideas about the causes and consequences of a social problem and considers few alternative approaches to solving a social problem.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Unable to demonstrate the ability to explore and consider a range and number of ideas about the causes and consequences of a social problem and fails to consider alternative approaches to solving a social problem.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.CCT.2Generating ideas, exploring possibilities, and considering alternatives

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsExceeds Objective | Demonstrates ability to generate, explore, and consider a wide range and number of ideas, possibilities, and alternatives.

3 ptsMeets Objective | Demonstrates ability to generate, explore, and consider a reasonably wide range and number of ideas, possibilities, and alternatives.

2 ptsDoes Not Fully Meet Objective | Demonstrates minimal ability to generate, explore, and consider a range and number of ideas, possibilities, and alternatives.

1 ptsDoes Not Meet Objective | Unable to demonstrate the ability to generate, explore, and consider a range and number of ideas, possibilities, and alternatives.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze and evaluate ideas about the causes and consequences of social problems

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Thoroughly analyzes and evaluates ideas about the causes and consequences of social problems.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

Analyzes and evaluates ideas about the causes and consequences of social problems.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Inadequately analyzes and evaluates ideas about the causes and consequences of social problems.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Fails to analyze and evaluate ideas about the causes and consequences of social problems.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.CCT.3Analyzing and evaluating ideas or outcomes

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsExceeds Objective | Examines ideas or outcomes in significant depth and makes distinguished judgments

3 ptsMeets Objective | Examines ideas or outcomes in some depth and makes reasonable judgments

2 ptsDoes Not Fully Meet Objective | Examines ideas or outcomes with insufficient depth, or makes barely reasonable judgments

1 ptsDoes Not Meet Objective | Unable to examine ideas or outcomes with any depth, or makes unreasonable judgments

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplies the sociological imagination to a critical analysis of social problems

20 to >16.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Demonstrates considerable intellectual agility in connecting social and historical forces with social problems.

16 to >13.0 pts

Meets Objective

Demonstrates some intellectual agility in connecting social and historical forces with social problems.

13 to >9.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Demonstrates minimal intellectual agility in connecting social and historical forces to with social problems.

9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Unable to demonstrate minimal intellectual agility in connecting social and historical forces with social problem.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.CCT.4Applying information and ideas to other contexts

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 ptsExceeds Objective | Demonstrates considerable intellectual agility in transferring knowledge or connecting disparate ideas

3 ptsMeets Objective | Demonstrates some intellectual agility in transferring knowledge or connecting disparate ideas

2 ptsDoes Not Fully Meet Objective | Demonstrates minimal intellectual agility in transferring knowledge or connecting disparate ideas

1 ptsDoes Not Meet Objective | Unable to demonstrate any intellectual agility in transferring knowledge or connecting disparate ideas

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBibliography and Citations

10 to >8.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

Well organized bibliography and proper citations using APA style of citation.

8 to >6.0 pts

Meets Objective

Well organized bibliography and proper citations although there are some errors.

6 to >4.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

Bibliography is not well organized and/or there are significant errors with the citations.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

Paper lacks a proper bibliography or in text citations.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality

10 to >8.0 pts

Exceeds Objective

A properly structured essay with no grammatical errors in the writing.

8 to >6.0 pts

Meets Objective

A properly structured essay with few grammatical errors in the writing.

6 to >4.0 pts

Does Not Fully Meet Objective

A properly structured essay with some grammatical errors in the writing.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Objective

The essay has some structural errors and/or contains many grammatical errors in the writing.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more